Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: International journal of engineering sciences & research technology , The postulate of the equivalence of masses or the law of their proportionality?
Authors: Chubykalo, Andrew
Espinoza, Augusto
Kuligin, Viktor
Issue Date: Feb-2019
Publisher: International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology
Abstract: The main sources of GTR problems are analyzed. First, physicists and geometers in explaining phenomena do not take into account the simultaneous existence of two spaces (linear space-time and curvilinear space-time). Secondly, it is shown that the initial postulate on the equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses is erroneous from the point of view of philosophy and physics.Moreover, experimental testing of the hypothesis is difficult because of the lack of accuracy of the measuring devices. It is shown that gravity can be considered as a quadratic effect of electrodynamics. The postulate on the equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses must be replaced by the law of proportionality of the inertial mass of the body and its gravitational charge. The new approach fits in perfectly with the idea of J. Thomson on the electromagnetic nature of material bodies.
ISSN: 2277-9655
Other Identifiers: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Appears in Collections:*Documentos Académicos*-- UA Física

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The postulate of the equivalence2.pdf619,51 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons