Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/1503
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor39945es_ES
dc.contributor.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-8991-
dc.coverage.spatialGlobales_ES
dc.creatorSánchez-Arellano, Arsenio-
dc.creatorMadrigal Melchor, Jesús-
dc.creatorRodríguez Vargas, Isaac-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-08T19:04:59Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-08T19:04:59Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-19-
dc.identifierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/1503-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48779/mnp4-0r17-
dc.description.abstractElectron transmission through different non-conventional (non-uniform barrier height) gated and gapped graphene superlattices (GSLs) is studied. Linear, Gaussian, Lorentzian and Pöschl-Teller superlattice potential profiles have been assessed. A relativistic description of electrons in graphene as well as the transfer matrix method have been used to obtain the transmission properties. We find that it is not possible to have perfect or nearly perfect pass bands in gated GSLs. Regardless of the potential profile and the number of barriers there are remanent oscillations in the transmission bands. On the contrary, nearly perfect pass bands are obtained for gapped GSLs. The Gaussian profile is the best option when the number of barriers is reduced, and there is practically no difference among the profiles for large number of barriers. We also find that both gated and gapped GSLs can work as omnidirectional band-pass filters. In the case of gated Gaussian GSLs the omnidirectional range goes from −50° to 50° with an energy bandwidth of 55 meV, while for gapped Gaussian GSLs the range goes from −80° to 80° with a bandwidth of 40 meV. Here, it is important that the energy range does not include remanent oscillations. On the light of these results, the hole states inside the barriers of gated GSLs are not beneficial for band-pass filtering. So, the flatness of the pass bands is determined by the superlattice potential profile and the chiral nature of the charge carriers in graphene. Moreover, the width and the number of electron pass bands can be modulated through the superlattice structural parameters. We consider that our findings can be useful to design electron filters based on non-conventional GSLs.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.relation.urigeneralPublices_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.sourceScientific Reports, Vol. 9, Article number: 8759 (2019)es_ES
dc.subject.classificationCIENCIAS FISICO MATEMATICAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA [1]es_ES
dc.subject.otherNon-conventional superlatticeses_ES
dc.subject.othermonolayer graphenees_ES
dc.subject.otherband-pass filterses_ES
dc.titleNon-conventional graphene superlattices as electron band-pass filterses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
Appears in Collections:*Documentos Académicos*-- UA Cien. y Tec. de la Luz y la Mat. (LUMAT)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ASArellano2019SciRep.pdf3,53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons