Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/526
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-1834es_ES
dc.contributor.otherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-7946es_ES
dc.coverage.spatialGlobales_ES
dc.creatorChubykalo, Andrew-
dc.creatorEspinoza, Augusto-
dc.creatorAlvarado Flores, Rolando-
dc.creatorGutiérrez Rodríguez, Alejandro-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-12T16:27:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-12T16:27:48Z-
dc.date.issued2007-09-
dc.identifierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.identifier.issn1572-9516es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0015-9018es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/526-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48779/d00n-h186-
dc.description.abstractJosé A. Heras has recently raised interesting criticism [1] regarding the conclusions to our paper [2]. His main point is his assertion that the equations we derived for the solenoidal (Es ) and the irrotational (Ei ) components of the electric field E are a pair of coupled equations that can be reduced to one equation. If this is the case, our claim that there exists two mechanisms of energy and momentum propagation is incorrect and our example using a bounded oscillating charge on the x-axis must be incorrect and Heras attempts to find contradictions in our focus. Therefore in this paper we will show that the equations for Ei and Es are not coupled equations.We indicate the kind of problems that classical electrodynamics in its standard form cannot explain or predict, however, such problems can be solved using Helmholtz’ theorem and our interpretation of its use. Hence our claim that there exist two mechanisms of energy and momentum transfer, is, to our knowledge and according to our interpretation, correct.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.relation.urigeneralPublices_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.sourceFoundations of Physics, Vol. 37, Núm. 11, Septiembre 2007.es_ES
dc.subject.classificationCIENCIAS FISICO MATEMATICAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA [1]es_ES
dc.subject.otherHelmholtz theoremes_ES
dc.subject.otherV-gaugees_ES
dc.subject.otherElectromagnetic potentialses_ES
dc.subject.otherElectromagnetic waveses_ES
dc.titleReply to ‘Comment on “Helmholtz Theorem and the V-Gauge in the Problem of Superluminal and Instantaneous Signals in Classical Electrodynamics” by A. Chubykalo et al.’ by J.A. Heras [Found. Phys. Lett. vol. 19(6) p. 579 (2006)]es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
Appears in Collections:*Documentos Académicos*-- UA Física

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2007 Found Phys.pdf187,2 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons