Reply to Comment on ‘Electromagnetic potentials without gauge transformation’

Chubykalo, Andrew; Espinoza, Augusto; Alvarado Flores, Rolando

dc.contributor.other	https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-1834	es_ES
dc.contributor.other	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-7946	es_ES
dc.coverage.spatial	Global	es_ES
dc.creator	Chubykalo, Andrew
dc.creator	Espinoza, Augusto
dc.creator	Alvarado Flores, Rolando
dc.date.accessioned	2018-06-11T19:08:13Z
dc.date.available	2018-06-11T19:08:13Z
dc.date.issued	2012-03-22
dc.identifier	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion	es_ES
dc.identifier.issn	1402-4896	es_ES
dc.identifier.issn	0031-8949	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/520
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.48779/902f-vh37
dc.description.abstract	This is a reply to the criticism from Engelhardt and Onoochin of our work (2011 Phys. Scr. 84 015009): a general argument for the possibility of different solutions in different gauges unrelated to gauge transformation; a result that has been given by Engelhardt and Onoochin using examples. For this reason we are not in any sense trying to refute the statements made by Engelhardt and Onoochin, instead we are offering a possible theoretical explanation of their results.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	eng	es_ES
dc.publisher	The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences	es_ES
dc.relation	http://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1402-4896	es_ES
dc.relation.uri	generalPublic	es_ES
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/	*
dc.source	Physica Scripta, Núm, 85, 2012.	es_ES
dc.subject.classification	CIENCIAS FISICO MATEMATICAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA [1]	es_ES
dc.subject.other	Maxwell’s equations	es_ES
dc.subject.other	Electromagnetic potentials	es_ES
dc.title	Reply to Comment on ‘Electromagnetic potentials without gauge transformation’	es_ES
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	es_ES