Repositorio Dspace

Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor 271445 es_ES
dc.coverage.spatial Global es_ES
dc.creator Robles Rovelo, Cruz Octavio
dc.creator Playan, Enrique
dc.creator Cavero, José
dc.creator Zapata, Nery
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-09T17:52:59Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-09T17:52:59Z
dc.date.issued 2017-09
dc.identifier info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0378-3774 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/handle/20.500.11845/2872
dc.description.abstract Water and energy are limited and expensive resources. Conserving water and energy is a requirement to ensure the viability of modern pressurized irrigation systems. The objective of this research was to analyze the possibilities of reducing the nozzle operating pressure of impact sprinklers from 300 kPa (standard pressure) to 200 kPa (low pressure) in solid-set irrigation systems without reducing the sprinkler spacing and maintaining crop yield. Three treatments resulting from combinations of sprinkler type, and working pressure were analyzed: 1) Conventional impact sprinkler operating at 300 kPa (CIS300); 2) Conventional impact sprinkler operating at 200 kPa (CIS200); and 3) Modified deflecting plate impact sprinkler operating at 200 kPa (DPIS200). A randomized experimental design was applied to a maize crop during two seasons (2015 and 2016). Irrigation performance was measured by catch-can monitoring at one replicate of each treatment. Maize growth, yield and its components were measured. Differences between treatments in soil water, maize growth and yield variables were analyzed using ANOVA. Seasonal irrigation uniformity evaluated at the top of the canopy was larger for the standard pressure treatment (93%) than for the low pressure treatments (82% and 84% for DPIS200 and CIS200, respectively). The average wind drift and evaporation losses for the 2016 irrigation season were higher for the CIS300 treatment (17%) than for the low pressure treatments, DPIS200 (15%) and CIS200 (13%). Low pressure treatments did not reduce grain yield compared with the standard pressure treatment. Differences in irrigation performance and maize yield between the low pressure treatments, DPIS200 and CIS200, were not statistically significant. The reduction in energy use by reducing the operating pressure from 300 kPa to 200 kPa would allow to increase the net farming benefit of individual and collective systems. This is particularly true if low pressure irrigation is considered at the design phase of the irrigation system. es_ES
dc.language.iso eng es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.relation https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378377417302007 es_ES
dc.relation.uri generalPublic es_ES
dc.rights Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.source Agricultural Water Management Volume 191, September 2017, Pages 37-49 es_ES
dc.subject.classification CIENCIAS AGROPECUARIAS Y BIOTECNOLOGIA [6] es_ES
dc.subject.other irrigation systems es_ES
dc.subject.other sprinklers es_ES
dc.subject.other crop yield es_ES
dc.subject.other maize crop es_ES
dc.title Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize es_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia:

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Estados Unidos de América

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta

Estadísticas